Toyota Carina E 1992 vs Toyota Picnic 1996
Body: | Hatchback | Minivan / MPV | |
---|---|---|---|
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 116 HP | 128 HP | |
Torque: | 145 NM | 178 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.3 seconds | 10.8 seconds | |
Toyota Picnic is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Carina E engine produces 12 HP less power than Toyota Picnic, whereas torque is 33 NM less than Toyota Picnic. Due to the lower power, Toyota Carina E reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 9.0 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 7.5 l/100km | 9.1 l/100km | |
The Toyota Carina E is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota Carina E consumes 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Picnic, which means that by driving the Toyota Carina E over 15,000 km in a year you can save 285 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota Carina E consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Picnic. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
800 km with real consumption | 650 km with real consumption | ||
Toyota Carina E gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 15 years | 17 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla, Toyota Celica | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Carina E, Toyota Hiace | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.53 m | 4.53 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
Height: | 1.41 m | 1.62 m | |
Toyota Carina E and Toyota Picnic are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 470 litres | 180 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1250 litres | 1840 litres | |
Toyota Carina E has 290 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Picnic. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota Picnic (by 590 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 11 meters | |
The turning circle of the Toyota Carina E is 0.8 metres less than that of the Toyota Picnic, which means Toyota Carina E can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | 2`010 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | high | high | |
Toyota Picnic has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Toyota Carina E has serious deffects in 210 percent more cases than Toyota Picnic, so Toyota Picnic quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 1200 | 2200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Carina E has
|
Toyota Picnic has
| |