Toyota Carina E 1992 vs Honda Accord 1999

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Toyota Carina E
1992 - 1996
Honda Accord
1999 - 2001
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.6 - 2.01.6 - 2.3

Performance

Power: 73 - 175 HP105 - 154 HP
Torque: 132 - 186 NM140 - 210 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.4 - 16.4 seconds9.8 - 13.5 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.8 - 8.56.4 - 9.2
Toyota Carina E petrol engines consumes on average 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Honda Accord. On average, Toyota Carina E equipped with diesel engines consume 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda Accord.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.53 m4.60 m
Width: 1.70 m1.75 m
Height: 1.41 m1.43 m
Toyota Carina E is smaller.
Toyota Carina E is 7 cm shorter than the Honda Accord, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Carina E is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 470 litres450 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1250 litresno data
Even though the car is shorter, Toyota Carina E has 20 litres more trunk space than the Honda Accord. The Honda Accord may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers.
Turning diameter: 10.8 meters11.4 meters
The turning circle of the Toyota Carina E is 0.6 metres less than that of the Honda Accord, which means Toyota Carina E can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`684~ 1`914
Safety: no data
Quality:
high

above average
Average price (€): 12001000
Pros and Cons: Toyota Carina E has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
Honda Accord has
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv