Toyota Carina E 1992 vs Honda Accord 1999
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 1.6 - 2.0 | 1.6 - 2.3 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 73 - 175 HP | 105 - 154 HP | |
Torque: | 132 - 186 NM | 140 - 210 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.4 - 16.4 seconds | 9.8 - 13.5 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 - 8.5 | 6.4 - 9.2 | |
Toyota Carina E petrol engines consumes on average 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Honda Accord. On average, Toyota Carina E equipped with diesel engines consume 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda Accord. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.53 m | 4.60 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.75 m | |
Height: | 1.41 m | 1.43 m | |
Toyota Carina E is smaller. Toyota Carina E is 7 cm shorter than the Honda Accord, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Carina E is 2 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 470 litres | 450 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1250 litres | no data | |
Even though the car is shorter, Toyota Carina E has 20 litres more trunk space than the Honda Accord. The Honda Accord may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Toyota Carina E is 0.6 metres less than that of the Honda Accord, which means Toyota Carina E can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`684 | ~ 1`914 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | high | above average | |
Average price (€): | 1200 | 1000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Carina E has
|
Honda Accord has
| |