Toyota C-HR 2023 vs Mazda CX-30 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 152 HP | 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 190 NM | 224 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.9 seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
| Toyota C-HR engine produces 28 HP less power than Mazda CX-30, whereas torque is 34 NM less than Mazda CX-30. Despite less power, Toyota C-HR reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 5.6 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 43 litres | 48 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda CX-30 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Used also on Mazda 3 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mazda CX-30 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.56 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Toyota C-HR is 4 cm shorter than the Mazda CX-30, 4 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1406 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`070 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 23 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota C-HR has
|
Mazda CX-30 has
| |