Toyota C-HR 2023 vs Audi Q3 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 152 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 190 NM | 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.1 seconds | 7.8 seconds | |
|
Audi Q3 is a more dynamic driving. Toyota C-HR engine produces 18 HP less power than Audi Q3, whereas torque is 90 NM less than Audi Q3. Due to the lower power, Toyota C-HR reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 7.7 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 43 litres | 64 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 360'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Audi Q3 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Used also on Volkswagen Tiguan | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Audi Q3 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.61 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Toyota C-HR is 2 cm shorter than the Audi Q3, width is practically the same , while the height of Toyota C-HR is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 460 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`155 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 12 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Audi Q3 has
| |