Toyota C-HR 2023 vs Skoda Karoq 2021
| Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Hybrid | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Hybrid engines (Toyota C-HR) excel in urban environments with superior fuel efficiency and lower emissions during stop-and-go driving. Diesel engines (Skoda Karoq), however, are more fuel-efficient on long highway trips and provide greater torque for towing and heavy loads. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 152 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 190 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.3 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Toyota C-HR is more dynamic to drive. Toyota C-HR engine produces 36 HP more power than Skoda Karoq, but torque is 60 NM less than Skoda Karoq. Thanks to more power Toyota C-HR reaches 100 km/h speed 3.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Consumption: | 4.1 l/100km | ||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 43 litres | 50 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.63 m | |
|
Toyota C-HR is smaller. Toyota C-HR is 2 cm shorter than the Skoda Karoq, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota C-HR is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 521 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1630 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`008 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 27 400 | 26 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota C-HR has
|
Skoda Karoq has
| |