Toyota C-HR 2023 vs Seat Ateca 2020
| Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Hybrid | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Hybrid engines (Toyota C-HR) offer better fuel economy and lower emissions than petrol engines, especially in city driving with frequent stops. Petrol (Seat Ateca) engines, however, are typically less expensive to buy and maintain, and offer more consistent performance on highways. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 152 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 190 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.3 seconds | 7.1 seconds | |
|
Seat Ateca is a more dynamic driving. Toyota C-HR engine produces 38 HP less power than Seat Ateca, whereas torque is 130 NM less than Seat Ateca. Due to the lower power, Toyota C-HR reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Consumption: | 8.5 l/100km | ||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 43 litres | 55 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.62 m | |
|
Toyota C-HR is smaller. Toyota C-HR is 2 cm shorter than the Seat Ateca, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota C-HR is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 485 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1579 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.8 meters | |
| Gross weight: | no data | 2`100 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 31 000 | 19 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Seat Ateca has
| |