Toyota C-HR 2023 vs Peugeot 2008 2019
| Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Hybrid | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Hybrid engines (Toyota C-HR) offer better fuel economy and lower emissions than petrol engines, especially in city driving with frequent stops. Petrol (Peugeot 2008) engines, however, are typically less expensive to buy and maintain, and offer more consistent performance on highways. | |||
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 152 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 190 NM | 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.3 seconds | 9.1 seconds | |
|
Toyota C-HR is more dynamic to drive. Toyota C-HR engine produces 22 HP more power than Peugeot 2008, but torque is 40 NM less than Peugeot 2008. Thanks to more power Toyota C-HR reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Consumption: | =LNG_NAV_DATU?> | 6.0 l/100km | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 43 litres | 41 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Peugeot 2008 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 16 other car models, including Opel Corsa, Peugeot 308, Opel Combo, Peugeot 3008, Citroen C4 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Peugeot 2008 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Toyota C-HR engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Peugeot 2008 2019 1.2 engine: Since the timing belt is immersed in oil, it doesn't last the intended 180,000 kilometers, and its wear products clog the oilways. First years of engines have been recalled due to excessive axial play in the ... More about Peugeot 2008 2019 1.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.53 m | |
|
Toyota C-HR is larger. Toyota C-HR is 6 cm longer than the Peugeot 2008, 6 cm wider, while the height of Toyota C-HR is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 405 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1467 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`752 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 27 400 | 18 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota C-HR has
|
Peugeot 2008 has
| |
