Toyota C-HR 2023 vs Nissan Qashqai 2024
| Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Hybrid | 1.5 Petrol | |
| Hybrid engines (Toyota C-HR) offer better fuel economy and lower emissions than petrol engines, especially in city driving with frequent stops. Petrol (Nissan Qashqai) engines, however, are typically less expensive to buy and maintain, and offer more consistent performance on highways. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 152 HP | 158 HP | |
| Torque: | 190 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.3 seconds | 7.9 seconds | |
| Toyota C-HR engine produces 6 HP less power than Nissan Qashqai, whereas torque is 60 NM less than Nissan Qashqai. Despite less power, Toyota C-HR reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Consumption: | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 43 litres | 55 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.43 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.63 m | |
|
Toyota C-HR is smaller. Toyota C-HR is 7 cm shorter than the Nissan Qashqai, width is practically the same , while the height of Toyota C-HR is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 455 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1440 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.1 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`180 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 27 400 | 28 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota C-HR has
|
| |