Toyota C-HR 2023 vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2023
| Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Hybrid | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Hybrid engines (Toyota C-HR) excel in urban environments with superior fuel efficiency and lower emissions during stop-and-go driving. Diesel engines (Land Rover Range Rover Evoque), however, are more fuel-efficient on long highway trips and provide greater torque for towing and heavy loads. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 152 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 190 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.3 seconds | 10.1 seconds | |
| Toyota C-HR engine produces 11 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, whereas torque is 190 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. Despite less power, Toyota C-HR reaches 100 km/h speed 2.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Consumption: | 5.0 l/100km | ||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 43 litres | 65 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | no data | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.65 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 591 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1383 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.6 meters | |
| Gross weight: | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 31 000 | 43 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota C-HR has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
| |