Toyota C-HR 2016 vs Volkswagen T-Roc 2017
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 148 HP | 190 HP | |
Torque: | 189 NM | 320 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 seconds | 7.2 seconds | |
Volkswagen T-Roc is a more dynamic driving. Toyota C-HR engine produces 42 HP less power than Volkswagen T-Roc, whereas torque is 131 NM less than Volkswagen T-Roc. Due to the lower power, Toyota C-HR reaches 100 km/h speed 3.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 6.7 | |
Toyota C-HR consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen T-Roc, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota C-HR could require 30 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 50 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
860 km on highway | 870 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.36 m | 4.23 m | |
Width: | 1.80 m | 1.82 m | |
Height: | 1.56 m | 1.57 m | |
Toyota C-HR is 13 cm longer than the Volkswagen T-Roc, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota C-HR is 1 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 377 litres | 445 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1237 litres | |
Volkswagen T-Roc has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Toyota C-HR has 68 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen T-Roc. This could mean that the Toyota C-HR uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.1 meters | |
The turning circle of the Toyota C-HR is 0.1 metres less than that of the Volkswagen T-Roc. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`960 | 1`990 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | high | |
Average price (€): | 21 000 | 19 600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
|
Volkswagen T-Roc has
| |