Toyota C-HR 2016 vs Suzuki Vitara 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 148 HP | 117 HP | |
| Torque: | 189 NM | 151 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
|
Toyota C-HR is more dynamic to drive. Toyota C-HR engine produces 31 HP more power than Suzuki Vitara, whereas torque is 38 NM more than Suzuki Vitara. Thanks to more power Toyota C-HR reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 6.0 | |
|
The Suzuki Vitara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota C-HR consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Vitara, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota C-HR could require 135 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 47 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km on highway | 920 km on highway | ||
| Suzuki Vitara gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 17 years | 24 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Toyota RAV4, Lexus NX | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Suzuki Grand Vitara, Suzuki Swift, Suzuki SX4, Suzuki Liana | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Suzuki Vitara might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Toyota C-HR engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Suzuki Vitara 2018 1.6 engine: A simple and robust engine, not particularly demanding in terms of fuel quality.
High engine timing chain lifetime.
Tends to increase oil consumption, head gasket failures may occur. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.18 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Toyota C-HR is larger, but lower. Toyota C-HR is 19 cm longer than the Suzuki Vitara, 2 cm wider, while the height of Toyota C-HR is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 377 litres | 375 litres | |
| Toyota C-HR has 2 litres more trunk space than the Suzuki Vitara. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota C-HR is 0.6 metres more than that of the Suzuki Vitara, which means Toyota C-HR can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`960 | 1`720 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 21 000 | 18 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota C-HR has
|
Suzuki Vitara has
| |