Toyota C-HR 2016 vs Nissan Qashqai 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 148 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 189 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
|
Nissan Qashqai is a more dynamic driving. Toyota C-HR engine produces 15 HP less power than Nissan Qashqai, whereas torque is 51 NM less than Nissan Qashqai. Due to the lower power, Toyota C-HR reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 5.8 | |
|
The Nissan Qashqai is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota C-HR consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota C-HR could require 165 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 940 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km on highway | 1140 km on highway | ||
| Nissan Qashqai gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 300'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Toyota C-HR engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 16 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Toyota RAV4, Lexus NX | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Juke, Nissan Pulsar | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Qashqai might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Toyota C-HR engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.39 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.59 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Toyota C-HR is 3 cm shorter than the Nissan Qashqai, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota C-HR is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 377 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1585 litres | |
|
Nissan Qashqai has more luggage space. Toyota C-HR has 53 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota C-HR is 0.3 metres more than that of the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`960 | 1`900 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 19 000 | 17 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota C-HR has
|
Nissan Qashqai has
| |