Toyota C-HR 2016 vs Volkswagen T-Roc 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 122 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 142 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 7.2 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen T-Roc is a more dynamic driving. Toyota C-HR engine produces 68 HP less power than Volkswagen T-Roc, whereas torque is 178 NM less than Volkswagen T-Roc. Due to the lower power, Toyota C-HR reaches 100 km/h speed 3.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.9 | 6.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.3 l/100km | 8.2 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota C-HR is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota C-HR consumes 2.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen T-Roc, which means that by driving the Toyota C-HR over 15,000 km in a year you can save 420 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota C-HR consumes 2.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen T-Roc. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 43 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1100 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| 1220 km on highway | 870 km on highway | ||
| 810 km with real consumption | 600 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota C-HR gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.23 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.57 m | |
| Toyota C-HR is 13 cm longer than the Volkswagen T-Roc, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota C-HR is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 377 litres | 445 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1237 litres | |
|
Volkswagen T-Roc has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Toyota C-HR has 68 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen T-Roc. This could mean that the Toyota C-HR uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota C-HR is 0.1 metres less than that of the Volkswagen T-Roc. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`860 | 1`990 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 19 000 | 21 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota C-HR has
|
Volkswagen T-Roc has
| |