Toyota C-HR 2016 vs Suzuki Vitara 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 122 HP | 117 HP | |
| Torque: | 142 NM | 151 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
|
Toyota C-HR is more dynamic to drive. Toyota C-HR engine produces 5 HP more power than Suzuki Vitara, but torque is 9 NM less than Suzuki Vitara. Thanks to more power Toyota C-HR reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.9 | 6.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.3 l/100km | 7.0 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota C-HR is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota C-HR consumes 2.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Vitara, which means that by driving the Toyota C-HR over 15,000 km in a year you can save 315 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota C-HR consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Vitara. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 43 litres | 47 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1100 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
| 1220 km on highway | 920 km on highway | ||
| 810 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota C-HR gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 17 years | 25 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Toyota Corolla, Toyota Auris, Lexus CT | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Suzuki Grand Vitara, Suzuki Swift, Suzuki SX4, Suzuki Liana | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Suzuki Vitara might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Toyota C-HR engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Toyota C-HR 2016 1.8 engine: The Toyota 2ZR-FXE is a 1.8-liter gasoline engine produced since 2009 and designed specifically for Toyota hybrid powertrains. It is based on the conventional 2ZR-FE but adapted for hybrid operation, prioritizing efficiency rather than outright performance. The engine is very economical and, with ... More about Toyota C-HR 2016 1.8 engine Suzuki Vitara 2018 1.6 engine: A simple and robust engine, not particularly demanding in terms of fuel quality. High engine timing chain lifetime. Tends to increase oil consumption, head gasket failures may occur. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.18 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Toyota C-HR is larger, but lower. Toyota C-HR is 19 cm longer than the Suzuki Vitara, 2 cm wider, while the height of Toyota C-HR is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 377 litres | 375 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota C-HR is 0.6 metres more than that of the Suzuki Vitara, which means Toyota C-HR can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`860 kg | 1`720 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 18 000 | 16 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota C-HR has
|
Suzuki Vitara has
| |