Toyota C-HR 2016 vs Skoda Karoq 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 122 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 142 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Toyota C-HR engine produces 28 HP less power than Skoda Karoq, whereas torque is 108 NM less than Skoda Karoq. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.9 | no data | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Toyota C-HR engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Skoda Octavia, Audi A3, Skoda Superb, Audi Q3, Audi A1, Skoda Scala | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Toyota C-HR is smaller. Toyota C-HR is 2 cm shorter than the Skoda Karoq, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota C-HR is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 377 litres | 521 litres | |
|
Skoda Karoq has more luggage space. Toyota C-HR has 144 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Karoq. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`860 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 18 400 | 24 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota C-HR has
|
Skoda Karoq has
| |