Toyota C-HR 2016 vs Nissan Qashqai 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 122 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 142 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
|
Nissan Qashqai is a more dynamic driving. Toyota C-HR engine produces 41 HP less power than Nissan Qashqai, whereas torque is 98 NM less than Nissan Qashqai. Due to the lower power, Toyota C-HR reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.9 | 5.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.3 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota C-HR is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota C-HR consumes 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai, which means that by driving the Toyota C-HR over 15,000 km in a year you can save 285 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota C-HR consumes 2.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 43 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1100 km in combined cycle | 940 km in combined cycle | |
| 1220 km on highway | 1140 km on highway | ||
| 810 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota C-HR gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 300'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Toyota C-HR engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 17 years | 16 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Toyota Corolla, Toyota Auris, Lexus CT | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Juke, Nissan Pulsar | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Toyota C-HR engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Toyota C-HR 2016 1.8 engine: The Toyota 2ZR-FXE is a 1.8-liter gasoline engine produced since 2009 and designed specifically for Toyota hybrid powertrains. It is based on the conventional 2ZR-FE but adapted for hybrid operation, prioritizing efficiency rather than outright performance. The engine is very economical and, with ... More about Toyota C-HR 2016 1.8 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.39 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.59 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Toyota C-HR is 3 cm shorter than the Nissan Qashqai, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota C-HR is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 377 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1585 litres | |
|
Nissan Qashqai has more luggage space. Toyota C-HR has 53 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota C-HR is 0.3 metres more than that of the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`860 kg | 1`900 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`420 kg | 1`315 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 440 kg | 585 kg | |
| Toyota C-HR load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 33 procentiem less than Nissan Qashqai. Therefore, Nissan Qashqai is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 18 000 | 13 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota C-HR has
|
Nissan Qashqai has
| |