Toyota C-HR 2016 vs Honda HR-V 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 122 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 142 NM | 172 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Toyota C-HR engine produces 18 HP less power than Honda HR-V, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Honda HR-V. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.9 | 8.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.3 l/100km | 7.8 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota C-HR is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota C-HR consumes 4.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda HR-V, which means that by driving the Toyota C-HR over 15,000 km in a year you can save 630 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota C-HR consumes 2.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda HR-V. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 43 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1100 km in combined cycle | 610 km in combined cycle | |
| 1220 km on highway | 660 km on highway | ||
| 810 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota C-HR gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Toyota C-HR is larger, but lower. Toyota C-HR is 7 cm longer than the Honda HR-V, 2 cm wider, while the height of Toyota C-HR is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 377 litres | 431 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1456 litres | |
|
Honda HR-V has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Toyota C-HR has 54 litres less trunk space than the Honda HR-V. This could mean that the Toyota C-HR uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota C-HR is 0.4 metres less than that of the Honda HR-V, which means Toyota C-HR can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`860 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 20 800 | 17 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota C-HR has
|
Honda HR-V has
| |