Toyota C-HR 2016 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 3.2 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Toyota C-HR) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Mitsubishi Pajero) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 185 NM | 373 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 seconds | 13.2 seconds | |
| Toyota C-HR engine produces 54 HP less power than Mitsubishi Pajero, whereas torque is 188 NM less than Mitsubishi Pajero. Despite less power, Toyota C-HR reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 10.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.8 l/100km | 11.9 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota C-HR is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota C-HR consumes 4.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that by driving the Toyota C-HR over 15,000 km in a year you can save 630 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota C-HR consumes 4.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 88 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 790 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 870 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| 640 km with real consumption | 730 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi Pajero gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.39 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.85 m | |
|
Toyota C-HR is smaller. Toyota C-HR is 3 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota C-HR is 29 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 377 litres | 215 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1790 litres | |
|
Toyota C-HR has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Mitsubishi Pajero may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight: | 1`930 kg | 2`800 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`390 kg | 2`310 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 540 kg | 490 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 18 200 | 12 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota C-HR has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |