Toyota C-HR 2016 vs Suzuki Vitara 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 185 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 seconds | 10.2 seconds | |
|
Suzuki Vitara is a more dynamic driving. Toyota C-HR engine produces 24 HP less power than Suzuki Vitara, whereas torque is 35 NM less than Suzuki Vitara. Due to the lower power, Toyota C-HR reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 6.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.7 l/100km | 7.3 l/100km | |
|
The Suzuki Vitara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota C-HR consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Vitara, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota C-HR could require 15 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota C-HR consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Vitara. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 47 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 790 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| 870 km on highway | 900 km on highway | ||
| 640 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Suzuki Vitara engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Suzuki SX4, Suzuki Swift | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Suzuki Vitara might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.18 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Toyota C-HR is larger, but lower. Toyota C-HR is 19 cm longer than the Suzuki Vitara, 2 cm wider, while the height of Toyota C-HR is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 377 litres | 375 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1120 litres | |
| Toyota C-HR has 2 litres more trunk space than the Suzuki Vitara. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota C-HR is 0.6 metres more than that of the Suzuki Vitara, which means Toyota C-HR can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`930 | 1`730 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 19 200 | 18 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Suzuki Vitara has
| |