Toyota C-HR 2016 vs Honda HR-V 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 185 NM | 155 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 seconds | 10.2 seconds | |
|
Honda HR-V is a more dynamic driving. Toyota C-HR engine produces 14 HP less power than Honda HR-V, but torque is 30 NM more than Honda HR-V. Due to the lower power, Toyota C-HR reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 5.6 | |
|
The Honda HR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota C-HR consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda HR-V, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota C-HR could require 105 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 790 km in combined cycle | 890 km in combined cycle | |
| 870 km on highway | 1040 km on highway | ||
| Honda HR-V gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 380'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Honda HR-V engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 11 years | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Toyota C-HR engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Toyota C-HR is larger, but lower. Toyota C-HR is 7 cm longer than the Honda HR-V, 2 cm wider, while the height of Toyota C-HR is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 377 litres | 431 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1456 litres | |
|
Honda HR-V has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Toyota C-HR has 54 litres less trunk space than the Honda HR-V. This could mean that the Toyota C-HR uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota C-HR is 0.4 metres less than that of the Honda HR-V, which means Toyota C-HR can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`930 | 1`790 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 18 600 | 16 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota C-HR has
|
Honda HR-V has
| |