Toyota C-HR 2016 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 3.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 247 HP | |
| Torque: | 185 NM | 329 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 seconds | 10 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero is a more dynamic driving. Toyota C-HR engine produces 131 HP less power than Mitsubishi Pajero, whereas torque is 144 NM less than Mitsubishi Pajero. Due to the lower power, Toyota C-HR reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 13.4 | |
|
The Toyota C-HR is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota C-HR consumes 7.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that by driving the Toyota C-HR over 15,000 km in a year you can save 1125 litres of fuel. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.39 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.85 m | |
|
Toyota C-HR is smaller. Toyota C-HR is 3 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota C-HR is 29 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 377 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`865 | 2`665 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 17 200 | 12 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota C-HR has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |