Toyota C-HR 2016 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2006
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 3.2 Diesel | |
Petrol engines (Toyota C-HR) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Mitsubishi Pajero) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 116 HP | 170 HP | |
Torque: | 185 NM | 373 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 seconds | 13.2 seconds | |
Toyota C-HR engine produces 54 HP less power than Mitsubishi Pajero, whereas torque is 188 NM less than Mitsubishi Pajero. Despite less power, Toyota C-HR reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 10.5 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 7.3 l/100km | 11.9 l/100km | |
The Toyota C-HR is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota C-HR consumes 4.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that by driving the Toyota C-HR over 15,000 km in a year you can save 690 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota C-HR consumes 4.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.36 m | 4.39 m | |
Width: | 1.80 m | 1.88 m | |
Height: | 1.56 m | 1.85 m | |
Toyota C-HR is smaller. Toyota C-HR is 3 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota C-HR is 29 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 377 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 11 meters | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`865 | 2`800 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | below average | |
Average price (€): | 21 000 | 14 200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Toyota C-HR has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |