Toyota C-HR 2016 vs Toyota Auris 2015
| Body: | Crossover / SUV | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 185 NM | 185 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
| Toyota C-HR and Toyota Auris have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Toyota C-HR reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 4.6 | |
|
The Toyota Auris is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota C-HR consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Auris, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota C-HR could require 195 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 1080 km in combined cycle | |
| 980 km on highway | 1210 km on highway | ||
| Toyota Auris gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 280'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 11 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Toyota C-HR is larger. Toyota C-HR is 9 cm longer than the Toyota Auris, 4 cm wider, while the height of Toyota C-HR is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 377 litres | 360 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1199 litres | |
| Toyota C-HR has 17 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Auris. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota C-HR is 0.6 metres more than that of the Toyota Auris, which means Toyota C-HR can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`865 kg | 1`845 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`390 kg | 1`205 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 475 kg | 640 kg | |
| Toyota C-HR load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 35 procentiem less than Toyota Auris. Therefore, Toyota Auris is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 18 000 | 8400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Toyota Auris has
| |