Toyota C-HR 2016 vs Seat Ateca 2020
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Toyota C-HR) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Seat Ateca) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 185 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 seconds | 8.8 seconds | |
|
Seat Ateca is a more dynamic driving. Toyota C-HR engine produces 34 HP less power than Seat Ateca, whereas torque is 155 NM less than Seat Ateca. Due to the lower power, Toyota C-HR reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 5.6 | |
|
The Seat Ateca is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota C-HR consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Ateca, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota C-HR could require 45 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 890 km in combined cycle | |
| 980 km on highway | 1130 km on highway | ||
| Seat Ateca gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.62 m | |
|
Toyota C-HR is smaller. Toyota C-HR is 2 cm shorter than the Seat Ateca, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota C-HR is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 377 litres | 510 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1604 litres | |
|
Seat Ateca has more luggage space. Toyota C-HR has 133 litres less trunk space than the Seat Ateca. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota C-HR is 0.2 metres more than that of the Seat Ateca. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`865 kg | 2`030 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`390 kg | 1`439 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 475 kg | 591 kg | |
| Toyota C-HR load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 24 procentiem less than Seat Ateca. Therefore, Seat Ateca is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 18 000 | 19 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota C-HR has
|
Seat Ateca has
| |