Toyota C-HR 2016 vs Seat Ateca 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Toyota C-HR) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Seat Ateca) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 185 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
|
Seat Ateca is a more dynamic driving. Toyota C-HR engine produces 34 HP less power than Seat Ateca, whereas torque is 155 NM less than Seat Ateca. Due to the lower power, Toyota C-HR reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 4.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.3 l/100km | 6.4 l/100km | |
|
The Seat Ateca is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota C-HR consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Ateca, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota C-HR could require 225 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota C-HR consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Ateca. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 1130 km in combined cycle | |
| 680 km with real consumption | 780 km with real consumption | ||
| Seat Ateca gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.34 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.60 m | |
| Toyota C-HR is 2 cm longer than the Seat Ateca, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota C-HR is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 377 litres | 510 litres | |
|
Seat Ateca has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Toyota C-HR has 133 litres less trunk space than the Seat Ateca. This could mean that the Toyota C-HR uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota C-HR is 0.2 metres more than that of the Seat Ateca. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`865 | 1`970 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 17 400 | 19 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota C-HR has
|
Seat Ateca has
| |