Toyota C-HR 2016 vs Seat Ateca 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 185 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 seconds | 8.6 seconds | |
|
Seat Ateca is a more dynamic driving. Toyota C-HR engine produces 34 HP less power than Seat Ateca, whereas torque is 65 NM less than Seat Ateca. Due to the lower power, Toyota C-HR reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 50 litres | |
| 690 km with real consumption | 660 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 360'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Seat Ateca engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Audi A3, Skoda Superb, Seat Leon, Audi Q3 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Seat Ateca might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.34 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.60 m | |
| Toyota C-HR is 2 cm longer than the Seat Ateca, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota C-HR is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 377 litres | 510 litres | |
|
Seat Ateca has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Toyota C-HR has 133 litres less trunk space than the Seat Ateca. This could mean that the Toyota C-HR uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota C-HR is 0.2 metres more than that of the Seat Ateca. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`865 | 1`910 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 19 000 | 21 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota C-HR has
|
Seat Ateca has
| |