Toyota C-HR 2016 vs Mitsubishi ASX 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 185 NM | 195 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
| Toyota C-HR engine produces 34 HP less power than Mitsubishi ASX, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Mitsubishi ASX. Despite less power, Toyota C-HR reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 6.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.3 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota C-HR is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota C-HR consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX, which means that by driving the Toyota C-HR over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota C-HR consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 960 km in combined cycle | |
| 980 km on highway | 1080 km on highway | ||
| 680 km with real consumption | 820 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi ASX gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 20 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Mitsubishi Lancer, Mitsubishi Outlander, Peugeot 4008 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi ASX might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Toyota C-HR engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.64 m | |
| Toyota C-HR and Mitsubishi ASX are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 377 litres | 406 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1206 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi ASX has more luggage space. Toyota C-HR has 29 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi ASX. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota C-HR is 0.4 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi ASX, which means Toyota C-HR can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`865 | 1`970 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 17 000 | 14 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota C-HR has
|
Mitsubishi ASX has
| |