Toyota C-HR 2016 vs Mitsubishi ASX 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 117 HP | |
| Torque: | 185 NM | 154 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 seconds | 11.4 seconds | |
|
Toyota C-HR is more dynamic to drive. Toyota C-HR engine produces 1 HP less power than Mitsubishi ASX, but torque is 31 NM more than Mitsubishi ASX. Despite less power, Toyota C-HR reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 6.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.3 l/100km | 7.0 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi ASX is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Toyota C-HR consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX, which means that by driving the Toyota C-HR over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Toyota C-HR consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 1030 km in combined cycle | |
| 980 km on highway | 1260 km on highway | ||
| 680 km with real consumption | 900 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi ASX gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mitsubishi ASX engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 15 years | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi ASX might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Toyota C-HR engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.64 m | |
|
Toyota C-HR is smaller. Toyota C-HR and Mitsubishi ASX are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 377 litres | 384 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1206 litres | |
| Toyota C-HR has 7 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi ASX. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota C-HR is 0.4 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi ASX, which means Toyota C-HR can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`865 | 1`870 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 21 000 | 15 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Mitsubishi ASX has
| |