Toyota C-HR 2016 vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 185 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 seconds | 9.6 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is a more dynamic driving. Toyota C-HR engine produces 34 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, whereas torque is 215 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. Due to the lower power, Toyota C-HR reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 60 litres | |
| 690 km with real consumption | 740 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 560'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Range Rover Evoque engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Freelander, Jaguar XF | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.61 m | |
| Toyota C-HR and Land Rover Range Rover Evoque are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 377 litres | 550 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has more luggage space. Toyota C-HR has 173 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota C-HR is 0.3 metres less than that of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`865 | 2`350 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 18 400 | 23 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota C-HR has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
| |