Toyota C-HR 2016 vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 240 HP | |
| Torque: | 185 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 seconds | 7.6 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is a more dynamic driving. Toyota C-HR engine produces 124 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, whereas torque is 155 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. Due to the lower power, Toyota C-HR reaches 100 km/h speed 3.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 70 litres | |
| 680 km with real consumption | 660 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 300'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Land Rover Freelander, Land Rover Discovery Sport, Jaguar XJ, Jaguar XF | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Toyota C-HR engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.61 m | |
| Toyota C-HR and Land Rover Range Rover Evoque are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 377 litres | 550 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has more luggage space. Toyota C-HR has 173 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota C-HR is 0.3 metres less than that of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`865 | 2`350 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 17 200 | 19 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota C-HR has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
| |