Toyota C-HR 2016 vs Jeep Compass 2017

 
Toyota C-HR
2016 - 2023
Jeep Compass
2017 - 2020
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 1.2 Petrol1.4 Petrol

Performance

Power: 116 HP170 HP
Torque: 185 NM250 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.1 seconds9.3 seconds
Jeep Compass is a more dynamic driving.
Toyota C-HR engine produces 54 HP less power than Jeep Compass, whereas torque is 65 NM less than Jeep Compass. Due to the lower power, Toyota C-HR reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.96.9
Real fuel consumption: 7.3 l/100km9.6 l/100km
The Toyota C-HR is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Toyota C-HR consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Compass, which means that by driving the Toyota C-HR over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota C-HR consumes 2.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Compass.
Fuel tank capacity: 50 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 840 km in combined cycle860 km in combined cycle
980 km on highway1010 km on highway
680 km with real consumption620 km with real consumption
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive)

Jeep Compass 2017: It can have Freedom Drive I or II - an electronically controlled four-wheel drive system. Normally, the car has front-wheel drive, but if wheel slip is detected, it can automatically send up to 50% power to the rear wheels. The Freedom Drive I system is designed primarily for snow and similar conditions with limited traction. The Freedom Drive II version adds an off-road four-wheel drive mode, traction control, optimized engine and transmission performance for rock crawling, and hill descent control (not in EU editions).

Dimensions

Length: 4.36 m4.39 m
Width: 1.80 m1.82 m
Height: 1.56 m1.64 m
Toyota C-HR is smaller.
Toyota C-HR is 3 cm shorter than the Jeep Compass, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota C-HR is 8 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 377 litres458 litres
Jeep Compass has more luggage space.
Toyota C-HR has 81 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Compass.
Turning diameter: 11 meters11.1 meters
The turning circle of the Toyota C-HR is 0.1 metres less than that of the Jeep Compass.
Gross weight (kg): 1`865no data
Safety: no data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 20 80023 600
Pros and Cons: Toyota C-HR has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • lower price
Jeep Compass has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • has 4x4 drive
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv