Toyota C-HR 2016 vs Jeep Compass 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 185 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
|
Jeep Compass is a more dynamic driving. Toyota C-HR engine produces 54 HP less power than Jeep Compass, whereas torque is 65 NM less than Jeep Compass. Due to the lower power, Toyota C-HR reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 6.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.3 l/100km | 9.6 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota C-HR is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota C-HR consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Compass, which means that by driving the Toyota C-HR over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota C-HR consumes 2.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Compass. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
| 980 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| 680 km with real consumption | 620 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Jeep Compass 2017: It can have Freedom Drive I or II - an electronically controlled four-wheel drive system. Normally, the car has front-wheel drive, but if wheel slip is detected, it can automatically send up to 50% power to the rear wheels. The Freedom Drive I system is designed primarily for snow and similar conditions with limited traction. The Freedom Drive II version adds an off-road four-wheel drive mode, traction control, optimized engine and transmission performance for rock crawling, and hill descent control (not in EU editions). | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.39 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.64 m | |
|
Toyota C-HR is smaller. Toyota C-HR is 3 cm shorter than the Jeep Compass, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota C-HR is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 377 litres | 458 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1251 litres | |
|
Jeep Compass has more luggage space. Toyota C-HR has 81 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Compass. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota C-HR is 0.1 metres less than that of the Jeep Compass. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`865 kg | 2`087 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`390 kg | 1`549 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 475 kg | 538 kg | |
| Toyota C-HR load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 13 procentiem less than Jeep Compass. Therefore, Jeep Compass is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 18 000 | 21 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota C-HR has
|
Jeep Compass has
| |