Toyota C-HR 2016 vs Dacia Duster 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 185 NM | 156 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 seconds | 12.9 seconds | |
|
Toyota C-HR is more dynamic to drive. Toyota C-HR engine produces 1 HP more power than Dacia Duster, whereas torque is 29 NM more than Dacia Duster. Thanks to more power Toyota C-HR reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 7.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.2 l/100km | 7.7 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota C-HR is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota C-HR consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Dacia Duster, which means that by driving the Toyota C-HR over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota C-HR consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Dacia Duster. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
| 980 km on highway | 780 km on highway | ||
| 690 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota C-HR gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Dacia Duster 2017: Duster`s 4x4 system is adapted from Nissan Quashqai. It has 2WD, AUTO and LOCK modes which are selectable with a button. In 2WD mode the vehicle is FWD. In AUTO mode, the vehicle is normally FWD, but if wheel slip occurs, the rear wheels are engaged to gain traction. In LOCK mode (available at speeds up to 60km/h), the center differential splits torque 50/50 front/rear. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 25 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Renault Clio | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Dacia Duster might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Toyota C-HR engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.34 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.69 m | |
| Toyota C-HR is 2 cm longer than the Dacia Duster, width is practically the same , while the height of Toyota C-HR is 13 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 377 litres | 445 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1444 litres | |
|
Dacia Duster has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Toyota C-HR has 68 litres less trunk space than the Dacia Duster. This could mean that the Toyota C-HR uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota C-HR is 0.8 metres more than that of the Dacia Duster, which means Toyota C-HR can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`865 | 1`809 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 18 400 | 11 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota C-HR has
|
Dacia Duster has
| |