Toyota C-HR 2016 vs Cupra Ateca 2020
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 300 HP | |
| Torque: | 185 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 seconds | 4.9 seconds | |
|
Cupra Ateca is a more dynamic driving. Toyota C-HR engine produces 184 HP less power than Cupra Ateca, whereas torque is 215 NM less than Cupra Ateca. Due to the lower power, Toyota C-HR reaches 100 km/h speed 6.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 6.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.3 l/100km | 10.1 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota C-HR is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota C-HR consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Cupra Ateca, which means that by driving the Toyota C-HR over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota C-HR consumes 2.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Cupra Ateca. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 980 km on highway | 830 km on highway | ||
| 680 km with real consumption | 540 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.39 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Toyota C-HR is smaller. Toyota C-HR is 3 cm shorter than the Cupra Ateca, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota C-HR is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 377 litres | 485 litres | |
|
Cupra Ateca has more luggage space. Toyota C-HR has 108 litres less trunk space than the Cupra Ateca. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota C-HR is 0.2 metres more than that of the Cupra Ateca. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`865 kg | 2`170 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`390 kg | 1`551 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 475 kg | 619 kg | |
| Toyota C-HR load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 30 procentiem less than Cupra Ateca. Therefore, Cupra Ateca is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 18 000 | 33 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota C-HR has
|
Cupra Ateca has
| |