Toyota C-HR 2016 vs BMW X2 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 306 HP | |
| Torque: | 185 NM | 450 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 seconds | 5 seconds | |
|
BMW X2 is a more dynamic driving. Toyota C-HR engine produces 190 HP less power than BMW X2, whereas torque is 265 NM less than BMW X2. Due to the lower power, Toyota C-HR reaches 100 km/h speed 6.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 6.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.3 l/100km | 8.6 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota C-HR is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota C-HR consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW X2, which means that by driving the Toyota C-HR over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota C-HR consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW X2. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 61 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 1000 km in combined cycle | |
| 980 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| 680 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
| BMW X2 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 320'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a BMW X2 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including BMW 1 sērija, BMW 2 sērija | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW X2 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| BMW X2 2017 2.0 engine: Compared to their predecessors, B48 engines are more robust and less prone to major failures. They are well-suited for chip tuning, which can noticeably enhance performance and responsiveness without ... More about BMW X2 2017 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.53 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Toyota C-HR and BMW X2 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 377 litres | 470 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1355 litres | |
|
BMW X2 has more luggage space. Toyota C-HR has 93 litres less trunk space than the BMW X2. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota C-HR is 0.3 metres less than that of the BMW X2. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`865 | 2`190 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 17 200 | 20 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota C-HR has
|
BMW X2 has
| |