Toyota C-HR 2016 vs Suzuki Vitara 2018
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 185 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 seconds | 10.2 seconds | |
|
Suzuki Vitara is a more dynamic driving. Toyota C-HR engine produces 24 HP less power than Suzuki Vitara, whereas torque is 35 NM less than Suzuki Vitara. Due to the lower power, Toyota C-HR reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 6.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.0 l/100km | 6.8 l/100km | |
|
By specification Toyota C-HR consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Vitara, which means that by driving the Toyota C-HR over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Toyota C-HR consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Vitara. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 47 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 980 km on highway | 850 km on highway | ||
| 710 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota C-HR gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Suzuki Vitara engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Suzuki Swift, Suzuki SX4 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Suzuki Vitara might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Suzuki Vitara 2018 1.4 engine: The K14C Boosterjet engine is equipped with a turbocharging system that enhances air intake, providing excellent torque as early as 1,500 RPM.
However, the direct injection system contributes to carbon ... More about Suzuki Vitara 2018 1.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.18 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Toyota C-HR is larger, but lower. Toyota C-HR is 19 cm longer than the Suzuki Vitara, 2 cm wider, while the height of Toyota C-HR is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 377 litres | 375 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1120 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota C-HR is 0.6 metres more than that of the Suzuki Vitara, which means Toyota C-HR can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`845 kg | 1`730 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`375 kg | 1`195 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 470 kg | 535 kg | |
| Toyota C-HR load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 14 procentiem less than Suzuki Vitara. Therefore, Suzuki Vitara is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 18 000 | 16 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota C-HR has
|
Suzuki Vitara has
| |