Toyota C-HR 2016 vs Volkswagen T-Roc 2017
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.2 - 2.0 (petrol) | 1.0 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 - 152 HP | 110 - 300 HP | |
| Torque: | 142 - 190 NM | 200 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 - 11.4 seconds | 4.9 - 10.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.9 - 6.9 | 4.3 - 6.7 | |
|
Toyota C-HR petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen T-Roc. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.23 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.57 m | |
| Toyota C-HR is 13 cm longer than the Volkswagen T-Roc, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota C-HR is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 377 litres | 445 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1290 litres | |
|
Volkswagen T-Roc has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Toyota C-HR has 68 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen T-Roc. This could mean that the Toyota C-HR uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota C-HR is 0.1 metres less than that of the Volkswagen T-Roc. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`898 | ~ 1`945 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 19 000 | 21 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota C-HR has
|
Volkswagen T-Roc has
| |