Toyota C-HR 2016 vs Suzuki Vitara 2018
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.2 - 2.0 | 1.0 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 - 152 HP | 102 - 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 142 - 190 NM | 138 - 235 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 - 11.4 seconds | 9.5 - 13.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.9 - 6.9 | 5.3 - 6.3 | |
|
Toyota C-HR petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Suzuki Vitara. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.18 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Toyota C-HR is larger, but lower. Toyota C-HR is 19 cm longer than the Suzuki Vitara, 2 cm wider, while the height of Toyota C-HR is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 377 litres | 375 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1120 litres | |
| Toyota C-HR has 2 litres more trunk space than the Suzuki Vitara. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota C-HR is 0.6 metres more than that of the Suzuki Vitara, which means Toyota C-HR can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`898 | ~ 1`737 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 19 000 | 18 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota C-HR has
|
Suzuki Vitara has
| |