Toyota C-HR 2016 vs Seat Ateca 2016
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.2 - 2.0 (petrol) | 1.0 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 - 152 HP | 115 - 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 142 - 190 NM | 200 - 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 - 11.4 seconds | 8.3 - 11 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.9 - 6.9 | 4.3 - 5.3 | |
|
Toyota C-HR petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Seat Ateca. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.34 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.60 m | |
| Toyota C-HR is 2 cm longer than the Seat Ateca, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota C-HR is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 377 litres | 510 litres | |
|
Seat Ateca has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Toyota C-HR has 133 litres less trunk space than the Seat Ateca. This could mean that the Toyota C-HR uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota C-HR is 0.2 metres more than that of the Seat Ateca. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`898 | ~ 1`937 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 21 000 | 21 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota C-HR has
|
Seat Ateca has
| |