Toyota C-HR 2016 vs Nissan Qashqai 2017
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.2 - 2.0 (petrol) | 1.2 - 1.7 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 - 152 HP | 110 - 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 142 - 190 NM | 165 - 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 - 11.4 seconds | 8.9 - 13 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.9 - 6.9 | 3.8 - 5.8 | |
|
Toyota C-HR petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Nissan Qashqai. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.39 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.59 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Toyota C-HR is 3 cm shorter than the Nissan Qashqai, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota C-HR is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 377 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1598 litres | |
|
Nissan Qashqai has more luggage space. Toyota C-HR has 53 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota C-HR is 0.3 metres more than that of the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`898 | ~ 1`953 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 19 000 | 17 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota C-HR has
|
Nissan Qashqai has
| |