Toyota Aygo 2009 vs Suzuki Alto 2009
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 HP | 68 HP | |
| Torque: | 93 NM | 90 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.2 seconds | 17 seconds | |
|
Toyota Aygo is more dynamic to drive. Toyota Aygo and Suzuki Alto have the same engine power, but Toyota Aygo torque is 3 NM more than Suzuki Alto. Toyota Aygo reaches 100 km/h speed 2.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 | 5.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.3 l/100km | 6.5 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Aygo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota Aygo consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Alto, which means that by driving the Toyota Aygo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota Aygo consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Alto. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| 850 km on highway | 770 km on highway | ||
| 660 km with real consumption | 530 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Aygo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Suzuki Alto engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 20 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota Yaris, Citroen C1, Peugeot 107, Peugeot 108 | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Opel Agila, Suzuki Splash | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Aygo might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.42 m | 3.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.62 m | 1.60 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.47 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Toyota Aygo is 9 cm shorter than the Suzuki Alto, 2 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 139 litres | 129 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 774 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Toyota Aygo has 10 litres more trunk space than the Suzuki Alto. The Suzuki Alto may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.4 meters | 9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Aygo is 0.4 metres more than that of the Suzuki Alto, which means Toyota Aygo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`190 | 1`250 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 2800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Aygo has
|
Suzuki Alto has
| |