Toyota Aygo 2009 vs Ford KA 2008

 
Toyota Aygo
2009 - 2012
Ford KA
2008 - 2015
Gearbox: AutomaticManual
Engine: 1.0 Petrol1.2 Petrol

Performance

Power: 68 HP69 HP
Torque: 93 NM102 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 14.2 seconds13.1 seconds
Ford KA is a more dynamic driving.
Toyota Aygo engine produces 1 HP less power than Ford KA, whereas torque is 9 NM less than Ford KA. Due to the lower power, Toyota Aygo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.65.1
Real fuel consumption: 5.3 l/100km6.3 l/100km
The Toyota Aygo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Toyota Aygo consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford KA, which means that by driving the Toyota Aygo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota Aygo consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford KA.
Fuel tank capacity: 35 litres35 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 760 km in combined cycle680 km in combined cycle
850 km on highway790 km on highway
660 km with real consumption550 km with real consumption
Toyota Aygo gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 3.42 m3.62 m
Width: 1.62 m1.66 m
Height: 1.47 m1.51 m
Toyota Aygo is smaller.
Toyota Aygo is 21 cm shorter than the Ford KA, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Aygo is 4 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 139 litres224 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data710 litres
Ford KA has more luggage space.
Toyota Aygo has 85 litres less trunk space than the Ford KA.
Turning diameter: 9.4 meters9.3 meters
The turning circle of the Toyota Aygo is 0.1 metres more than that of the Ford KA.
Gross weight (kg): 1`1901`320
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

below average
Toyota Aygo has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Ford KA has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Toyota Aygo, so Toyota Aygo quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 32002200
Pros and Cons: Toyota Aygo has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • fewer faults
Ford KA has
  • more dynamic
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv