Toyota Aygo 2009 vs Ford KA 2008
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 HP | 69 HP | |
| Torque: | 93 NM | 102 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.2 seconds | 13.1 seconds | |
|
Ford KA is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Aygo engine produces 1 HP less power than Ford KA, whereas torque is 9 NM less than Ford KA. Due to the lower power, Toyota Aygo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 | 5.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.3 l/100km | 6.3 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Aygo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota Aygo consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford KA, which means that by driving the Toyota Aygo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota Aygo consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford KA. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| 850 km on highway | 790 km on highway | ||
| 660 km with real consumption | 550 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Aygo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Toyota Aygo 2009 1.0 engine: Engine often vibrates and has difficulty starting in cold weather. Timing chain lifetime is not very long. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.42 m | 3.62 m | |
| Width: | 1.62 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.51 m | |
|
Toyota Aygo is smaller. Toyota Aygo is 21 cm shorter than the Ford KA, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Aygo is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 139 litres | 224 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 710 litres | |
|
Ford KA has more luggage space. Toyota Aygo has 85 litres less trunk space than the Ford KA. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.4 meters | 9.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Aygo is 0.1 metres more than that of the Ford KA. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`190 | 1`320 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Toyota Aygo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford KA has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Toyota Aygo, so Toyota Aygo quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 2800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Aygo has
|
Ford KA has
| |