Toyota Aygo 2009 vs Chevrolet Spark 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 HP | 81 HP | |
| Torque: | 93 NM | 111 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.2 seconds | 12.1 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Spark is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Aygo engine produces 13 HP less power than Chevrolet Spark, whereas torque is 18 NM less than Chevrolet Spark. Due to the lower power, Toyota Aygo reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 | 5.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.2 l/100km | 6.2 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Aygo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota Aygo consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Spark, which means that by driving the Toyota Aygo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota Aygo consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Spark. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| 890 km on highway | 830 km on highway | ||
| 670 km with real consumption | 560 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Aygo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 21 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota Yaris, Citroen C1, Peugeot 107, Peugeot 108 | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Aygo might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Toyota Aygo 2009 1.0 engine: Engine often vibrates and has difficulty starting in cold weather. Timing chain lifetime is not very long. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.42 m | 3.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.62 m | 1.60 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.52 m | |
| Toyota Aygo is 23 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Spark, 2 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Aygo is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 139 litres | 170 litres | |
|
Chevrolet Spark has more luggage space. Toyota Aygo has 31 litres less trunk space than the Chevrolet Spark. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.4 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Aygo is 0.6 metres less than that of the Chevrolet Spark, which means Toyota Aygo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`190 | 1`360 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Toyota Aygo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chevrolet Spark has serious deffects in 80 percent more cases than Toyota Aygo, so Toyota Aygo quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Aygo has
|
Chevrolet Spark has
| |