Toyota Aygo 2005 vs Toyota iQ 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Diesel | 1.4 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 55 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 130 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.8 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
|
Toyota iQ is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Aygo engine produces 35 HP less power than Toyota iQ, whereas torque is 60 NM less than Toyota iQ. Due to the lower power, Toyota Aygo reaches 100 km/h speed 6.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 | 4.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 4.7 l/100km | 4.8 l/100km | |
|
By specification Toyota Aygo consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota iQ, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Aygo could require 30 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Toyota Aygo consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota iQ. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 32 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 1020 km on highway | 910 km on highway | ||
| 740 km with real consumption | 660 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 390'000 km | 300'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Toyota Aygo engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 2 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Toyota Corolla, Toyota Auris, Toyota Yaris | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota iQ might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Toyota Aygo engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Toyota iQ 2009 1.4 engine: Toyota introduced this 1.4-liter turbocharged diesel engine in 2001, and production continued until 2017. It features a Bosch Common Rail fuel injection system, initially equipped with electromagnetic injectors until 2008. These were later replaced by non-repairable ... More about Toyota iQ 2009 1.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.41 m | 2.99 m | |
| Width: | 1.62 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.50 m | |
| Toyota Aygo is 43 cm longer than the Toyota iQ, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Aygo is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 139 litres | 32 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
751 litres | 238 litres | |
|
Toyota Aygo has more luggage capacity. Toyota Aygo has 107 litres more trunk space than the Toyota iQ. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota Aygo (by 513 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.4 meters | 7.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Aygo is 1.6 metres more than that of the Toyota iQ, which means Toyota Aygo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`245 | 1`285 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Toyota iQ has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Toyota Aygo has serious deffects in 90 percent more cases than Toyota iQ, so Toyota iQ quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 4800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Aygo has
|
Toyota iQ has
| |