Toyota Aygo 2005 vs Nissan Micra 2008

 
Toyota Aygo
2005 - 2009
Nissan Micra
2008 - 2011
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.4 Diesel1.4 Petrol
Diesel (Toyota Aygo) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Nissan Micra) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences."
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming chain
Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors.

Performance

Power: 55 HP88 HP
Torque: 130 NM128 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 16.8 seconds11.9 seconds
Nissan Micra is a more dynamic driving.
Toyota Aygo engine produces 33 HP less power than Nissan Micra, but torque is 2 NM more than Nissan Micra. Due to the lower power, Toyota Aygo reaches 100 km/h speed 4.9 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.26.3
Real fuel consumption: 4.7 l/100km6.8 l/100km
The Toyota Aygo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Toyota Aygo consumes 2.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Micra, which means that by driving the Toyota Aygo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 315 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota Aygo consumes 2.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Micra.
Fuel tank capacity: 35 litres46 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 830 km in combined cycle730 km in combined cycle
1020 km on highway850 km on highway
740 km with real consumption670 km with real consumption
Toyota Aygo gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 390'000 km300'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Toyota Aygo engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 2 years11 years
Engine spread: Used only for this carInstalled on at least 2 other car models, including Nissan Note, Nissan Cube
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Micra might be a better choice in this respect.
Hydraulic tappets: yesno
The Toyota Aygo engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.

Dimensions

Length: 3.41 m3.72 m
Width: 1.62 m1.66 m
Height: 1.46 m1.54 m
Toyota Aygo is smaller.
Toyota Aygo is 31 cm shorter than the Nissan Micra, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Aygo is 8 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 139 litres251 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
751 litres584 litres
Toyota Aygo has 112 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Micra. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota Aygo (by 167 litres).
Turning diameter: 9.4 meters9.2 meters
The turning circle of the Toyota Aygo is 0.2 metres more than that of the Nissan Micra.
Gross weight (kg): 1`2451`475
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

low
Toyota Aygo has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Micra has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Toyota Aygo, so Toyota Aygo quality is probably better
Average price (€): 18003200
Pros and Cons: Toyota Aygo has
  • timing belt engine
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Nissan Micra has
  • timing chain engine
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv