Toyota Aygo 2005 vs Citroen C1 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Diesel | 1.4 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 55 HP | 54 HP | |
| Torque: | 130 NM | 130 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.8 seconds | 15.6 seconds | |
| Toyota Aygo engine produces 1 HP more power than Citroen C1, the torque is the same for both cars. Despite the higher power, Toyota Aygo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 | 4.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 4.7 l/100km | 4.3 l/100km | |
|
The Citroen C1 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota Aygo consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C1, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Aygo could require 15 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota Aygo consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C1. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| 1020 km on highway | 1020 km on highway | ||
| 740 km with real consumption | 810 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 390'000 km | 440'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Citroen C1 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 2 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Used also on Peugeot 107 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Citroen C1 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.41 m | 3.44 m | |
| Width: | 1.62 m | 1.63 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.46 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Toyota Aygo is 3 cm shorter than the Citroen C1, 1 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 139 litres | 139 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
751 litres | 712 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.4 meters | 9.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Aygo is 0.1 metres less than that of the Citroen C1. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`245 | 1`235 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Toyota Aygo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen C1 has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Toyota Aygo, so Toyota Aygo quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Aygo has
|
Citroen C1 has
| |