Toyota Aygo 2005 vs Renault Twingo 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.1 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 93 NM | 107 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.9 seconds | 13.6 seconds | |
|
Renault Twingo is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Aygo engine produces 7 HP less power than Renault Twingo, whereas torque is 14 NM less than Renault Twingo. Due to the lower power, Toyota Aygo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.8 | 5.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.6 l/100km | 7.0 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Aygo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota Aygo consumes 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Twingo, which means that by driving the Toyota Aygo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 270 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota Aygo consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Twingo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 40 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 920 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
| 1020 km on highway | 850 km on highway | ||
| 620 km with real consumption | 570 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Aygo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 21 years | 17 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota Yaris, Citroen C1, Peugeot 107, Peugeot 108 | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Renault Clio, Dacia Logan, Renault Kangoo, Dacia Sandero | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Aygo might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Toyota Aygo 2005 1.0 engine: Engine often vibrates and has difficulty starting in cold weather. Timing chain lifetime is not very long. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.41 m | 3.69 m | |
| Width: | 1.62 m | 1.65 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Toyota Aygo is smaller. Toyota Aygo is 28 cm shorter than the Renault Twingo, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Aygo is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 139 litres | 165 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
751 litres | 959 litres | |
|
Renault Twingo has more luggage space. Toyota Aygo has 26 litres less trunk space than the Renault Twingo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Twingo (by 208 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.4 meters | 9.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Aygo is 0.5 metres less than that of the Renault Twingo, which means Toyota Aygo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`160 | 1`370 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | Renault Twingo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Toyota Aygo has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Renault Twingo, so Renault Twingo quality is probably better | ||
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Aygo has
|
Renault Twingo has
| |