Toyota Aygo 2005 vs Volkswagen Lupo 1998
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 HP | 50 HP | |
| Torque: | 93 NM | 86 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.2 seconds | 17.7 seconds | |
|
Toyota Aygo is more dynamic to drive. Toyota Aygo engine produces 18 HP more power than Volkswagen Lupo, whereas torque is 7 NM more than Volkswagen Lupo. Thanks to more power Toyota Aygo reaches 100 km/h speed 3.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.8 | 5.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.4 l/100km | 6.4 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Aygo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota Aygo consumes 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Lupo, which means that by driving the Toyota Aygo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 270 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota Aygo consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Lupo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 34 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 920 km in combined cycle | 600 km in combined cycle | |
| 1020 km on highway | 730 km on highway | ||
| 640 km with real consumption | 530 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Aygo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.41 m | 3.53 m | |
| Width: | 1.62 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Toyota Aygo is smaller. Toyota Aygo is 12 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Lupo, 2 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 139 litres | 130 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
751 litres | 830 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Toyota Aygo has 9 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Lupo. The Volkswagen Lupo may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Lupo (by 79 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.4 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Aygo is 0.4 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Lupo, which means Toyota Aygo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`160 | 1`340 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Toyota Aygo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Lupo has serious deffects in 80 percent more cases than Toyota Aygo, so Toyota Aygo quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Aygo has
|
Volkswagen Lupo has
| |