Toyota Aygo 2005 vs Kia Picanto 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.1 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 HP | 65 HP | |
| Torque: | 93 NM | 97 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.2 seconds | 17.9 seconds | |
|
Toyota Aygo is more dynamic to drive. Toyota Aygo engine produces 3 HP more power than Kia Picanto, but torque is 4 NM less than Kia Picanto. Thanks to more power Toyota Aygo reaches 100 km/h speed 3.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.8 | 5.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.4 l/100km | 7.0 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Aygo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota Aygo consumes 2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Picanto, which means that by driving the Toyota Aygo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 300 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota Aygo consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Picanto. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 920 km in combined cycle | 600 km in combined cycle | |
| 1020 km on highway | 720 km on highway | ||
| 640 km with real consumption | 500 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Aygo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Kia Picanto engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 20 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota Yaris, Citroen C1, Peugeot 107, Peugeot 108 | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Hyundai Getz, Hyundai i10 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Aygo might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.41 m | 3.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.62 m | 1.60 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.48 m | |
| Toyota Aygo is 9 cm shorter than the Kia Picanto, 2 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Aygo is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 139 litres | 220 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
751 litres | 882 litres | |
|
Kia Picanto has more luggage space. Toyota Aygo has 81 litres less trunk space than the Kia Picanto. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Kia Picanto (by 131 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.4 meters | 9.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Aygo is 0.2 metres more than that of the Kia Picanto. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`160 | 1`350 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | low | |
| Toyota Aygo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Kia Picanto has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Toyota Aygo, so Toyota Aygo quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Aygo has
|
Kia Picanto has
| |