Toyota Aygo 2005 vs Ford KA 1998
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 HP | 50 HP | |
| Torque: | 93 NM | 97 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.2 seconds | 17.7 seconds | |
|
Toyota Aygo is more dynamic to drive. Toyota Aygo engine produces 18 HP more power than Ford KA, but torque is 4 NM less than Ford KA. Thanks to more power Toyota Aygo reaches 100 km/h speed 3.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.8 | 5.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.4 l/100km | 6.5 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Aygo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota Aygo consumes 2.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford KA, which means that by driving the Toyota Aygo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 315 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota Aygo consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford KA. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 42 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 920 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
| 1020 km on highway | 870 km on highway | ||
| 640 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Aygo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Toyota Aygo 2005 1.0 engine: Engine often vibrates and has difficulty starting in cold weather. Timing chain lifetime is not very long. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.41 m | 3.62 m | |
| Width: | 1.62 m | 1.63 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.37 m | |
|
Toyota Aygo is smaller, but higher. Toyota Aygo is 21 cm shorter than the Ford KA, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Aygo is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 139 litres | 186 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
751 litres | 724 litres | |
| Toyota Aygo has 47 litres less trunk space than the Ford KA. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota Aygo (by 27 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.4 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Aygo is 0.4 metres less than that of the Ford KA, which means Toyota Aygo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`160 | 1`265 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | low | |
| Toyota Aygo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford KA has serious deffects in 640 percent more cases than Toyota Aygo, so Toyota Aygo quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Aygo has
|
Ford KA has
| |