Toyota Aygo 2005 vs Citroen C2 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 HP | 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 93 NM | 143 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.2 seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
|
Citroen C2 is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Aygo engine produces 57 HP less power than Citroen C2, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Citroen C2. Due to the lower power, Toyota Aygo reaches 100 km/h speed 5.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.8 | 6.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.4 l/100km | 7.8 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Aygo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota Aygo consumes 3.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C2, which means that by driving the Toyota Aygo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 465 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota Aygo consumes 2.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C2. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 41 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 920 km in combined cycle | 590 km in combined cycle | |
| 1020 km on highway | 750 km on highway | ||
| 640 km with real consumption | 520 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Aygo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Toyota Aygo 2005 1.0 engine: Engine often vibrates and has difficulty starting in cold weather. Timing chain lifetime is not very long. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.41 m | 3.67 m | |
| Width: | 1.62 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Toyota Aygo is smaller. Toyota Aygo is 26 cm shorter than the Citroen C2, 4 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 139 litres | 166 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
751 litres | 879 litres | |
|
Citroen C2 has more luggage space. Toyota Aygo has 27 litres less trunk space than the Citroen C2. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Citroen C2 (by 128 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.4 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Aygo is 1.3 metres less than that of the Citroen C2, which means Toyota Aygo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`160 | 1`415 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | low | |
| Toyota Aygo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen C2 has serious deffects in 65 percent more cases than Toyota Aygo, so Toyota Aygo quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Aygo has
|
Citroen C2 has
| |